Contenu | Rechercher | Menus

Annonce

Si vous avez des soucis pour rester connecté, déconnectez-vous puis reconnectez-vous depuis ce lien en cochant la case
Me connecter automatiquement lors de mes prochaines visites.

À propos de l'équipe du forum.

#1 Le 02/02/2016, à 21:25

Compte supprimé

OpenDNS plus rapide sauf …

Bonjour, ayant des problèmes de connexions FreeBox depuis un an…
je viens de tester différent DNS (étant chez FREE ADSL2+) :

#DNS de OVH dns1.isp.ovh.net en 33,5ms

ludovic@ubuntu:~$ ping -c3 91.121.161.184 #DNS de OVH dns1.isp.ovh.net 
PING 91.121.161.184 (91.121.161.184) 56(84) bytes of data.
64 bytes from 91.121.161.184: icmp_seq=1 ttl=54 time=34.2 ms
64 bytes from 91.121.161.184: icmp_seq=2 ttl=54 time=33.6 ms
64 bytes from 91.121.161.184: icmp_seq=3 ttl=54 time=32.8 ms                                                  
                                                                                                              
--- 91.121.161.184 ping statistics ---                                                                        
3 packets transmitted, 3 received, 0% packet loss, time 2003ms                                                
rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 32.820/33.560/34.216/0.592 ms                                                          

#DNS de FREE ??? 30,0ms

ludovic@ubuntu:~$ ping -c3 212.27.40.240 #DNS de FREE ???
PING 212.27.40.240 (212.27.40.240) 56(84) bytes of data.
64 bytes from 212.27.40.240: icmp_seq=1 ttl=55 time=30.0 ms
64 bytes from 212.27.40.240: icmp_seq=2 ttl=55 time=30.1 ms
64 bytes from 212.27.40.240: icmp_seq=3 ttl=55 time=29.9 ms

--- 212.27.40.240 ping statistics ---
3 packets transmitted, 3 received, 0% packet loss, time 2002ms
rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 29.933/30.015/30.102/0.211 ms

#DNS de SFR disparus ???

ludovic@ubuntu:~$ ping -c3 109.0.66.10
PING 109.0.66.10 (109.0.66.10) 56(84) bytes of data.
^C
--- 109.0.66.10 ping statistics ---
2 packets transmitted, 0 received, 100% packet loss, time 999ms

#DNS de google en 30,4ms

ludovic@ubuntu:~$ ping -c3 8.8.8.8 #google
PING 8.8.8.8 (8.8.8.8) 56(84) bytes of data.
64 bytes from 8.8.8.8: icmp_seq=1 ttl=52 time=30.7 ms
64 bytes from 8.8.8.8: icmp_seq=2 ttl=52 time=29.8 ms
64 bytes from 8.8.8.8: icmp_seq=3 ttl=52 time=30.6 ms

--- 8.8.8.8 ping statistics ---
3 packets transmitted, 3 received, 0% packet loss, time 2003ms
rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 29.854/30.422/30.775/0.430 ms

212.216.172.62 #Alice plus de DNS ???

ludovic@ubuntu:~$ ping -c3 212.216.172.62 #Alice plus de DNS
PING 212.216.172.62 (212.216.172.62) 56(84) bytes of data.
^C
--- 212.216.172.62 ping statistics ---
3 packets transmitted, 0 received, 100% packet loss, time 1999ms

62.4.16.80 # Nerim plus de DNS ???

ludovic@ubuntu:~$ ping -c3 62.4.16.80 # Nerim plus de DNS
PING 62.4.16.80 (62.4.16.80) 56(84) bytes of data.
^C
--- 62.4.16.80 ping statistics ---
2 packets transmitted, 0 received, 100% packet loss, time 1006ms

89.2.0.1 #Numéricable plus de DNS !!! ????? Je viens de téléphoner à quelqu'un qui a numéricable et qui confirme l'adresse 89.2.0.1 ! mad

ludovic@ubuntu:~$ ping -c3 89.2.0.1
PING 89.2.0.1 (89.2.0.1) 56(84) bytes of data.
^C
--- 89.2.0.1 ping statistics ---
3 packets transmitted, 0 received, 100% packet loss, time 2016ms

208.67.222.222 #OpenDNS solution alternative : les serveurs DNS libres.
# OpenDNS en est un, ces serveurs sont utilisables gratuitement quel que soit votre fournisseur d'accès. Ils sont généralement plus rapides et offrent une protection contre le phishing.

ludovic@ubuntu:~$ ping -c3 208.67.222.222 #OpenDNS solution alternative : les serveurs DNS libres.
PING 208.67.222.222 (208.67.222.222) 56(84) bytes of data.
64 bytes from 208.67.222.222: icmp_seq=1 ttl=50 time=87.2 ms
64 bytes from 208.67.222.222: icmp_seq=2 ttl=50 time=89.2 ms
64 bytes from 208.67.222.222: icmp_seq=3 ttl=50 time=84.3 ms

--- 208.67.222.222 ping statistics ---
3 packets transmitted, 3 received, 0% packet loss, time 2000ms
rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 84.371/86.959/89.218/2.021 ms

OpenDNS plus rapide en théorie, ou à l'époque de l'article (©2015) ?

En attendant, je ne peux plus joindre les DNS de SFR … ni de Numéricable depuis mon réseau ?

il y a quelques semaines les DNS de SFR répondaient en 16 ms !!! (je crois)…et avait tendance à me faire penser que ce n'est pas pour rien que je suis envahi de bannières de publicités SFR depuis ma FreeBox.

Sources des adresses DNS :  Serveurs DNS des principaux FAI (février 2016)

Dernière modification par Compte supprimé (Le 02/02/2016, à 21:26)

#2 Le 02/02/2016, à 21:48

Compte anonymisé

Re : OpenDNS plus rapide sauf …

Test de ping sur DNS et Numericable
(Suis chez SFR)

[giadmin@asshole ~]$ ping 109.0.66.20
PING 109.0.66.20 (109.0.66.20) 56(84) bytes of data.
64 bytes from 109.0.66.20: icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=42.2 ms
64 bytes from 109.0.66.20: icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=40.1 ms
64 bytes from 109.0.66.20: icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=39.2 ms
64 bytes from 109.0.66.20: icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=41.2 ms
64 bytes from 109.0.66.20: icmp_seq=5 ttl=57 time=39.7 ms
^C
--- 109.0.66.20 ping statistics ---
5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4006ms
rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 39.233/40.522/42.248/1.087 ms
[giadmin@asshole ~]$ ping 109.0.66.10
PING 109.0.66.10 (109.0.66.10) 56(84) bytes of data.
64 bytes from 109.0.66.10: icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=41.3 ms
64 bytes from 109.0.66.10: icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=40.1 ms
64 bytes from 109.0.66.10: icmp_seq=3 ttl=57 time=39.7 ms
64 bytes from 109.0.66.10: icmp_seq=4 ttl=57 time=42.7 ms
^C
--- 109.0.66.10 ping statistics ---
4 packets transmitted, 4 received, 0% packet loss, time 3002ms
rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 39.779/41.034/42.775/1.194 ms
[giadmin@asshole ~]$ ping 89.2.0.1
PING 89.2.0.1 (89.2.0.1) 56(84) bytes of data.
64 bytes from 89.2.0.1: icmp_seq=1 ttl=58 time=50.3 ms
64 bytes from 89.2.0.1: icmp_seq=2 ttl=58 time=48.7 ms
64 bytes from 89.2.0.1: icmp_seq=3 ttl=58 time=50.9 ms
64 bytes from 89.2.0.1: icmp_seq=4 ttl=58 time=51.5 ms
64 bytes from 89.2.0.1: icmp_seq=5 ttl=58 time=47.9 ms
^C
--- 89.2.0.1 ping statistics ---
5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4006ms
rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 47.916/49.916/51.564/1.387 ms
[giadmin@asshole ~]$ 

#3 Le 02/02/2016, à 21:55

Compte supprimé

Re : OpenDNS plus rapide sauf …

Merci jojo81 !

Bizarre !

ping 109.0.66.20
PING 109.0.66.20 (109.0.66.20) 56(84) bytes of data.
^C
--- 109.0.66.20 ping statistics ---
42 packets transmitted, 0 received, 100% packet loss, time 41326ms
ping 109.0.66.10
PING 109.0.66.10 (109.0.66.10) 56(84) bytes of data.
^C
--- 109.0.66.10 ping statistics ---
15 packets transmitted, 0 received, 100% packet loss, time 13999ms
ping 89.2.0.1
PING 89.2.0.1 (89.2.0.1) 56(84) bytes of data.
^C
--- 89.2.0.1 ping statistics ---
32 packets transmitted, 0 received, 100% packet loss, time 31248ms

#4 Le 02/02/2016, à 22:10

Compte anonymisé

Re : OpenDNS plus rapide sauf …

Par contre, pas de ping chez Alice ou Nerim

#5 Le 03/02/2016, à 02:01

Compte supprimé

Re : OpenDNS plus rapide sauf …

Est-ce que Nerim est un grand fournisseur de réseau ?